100 CSS3 Pagination Styles is a ThemeForest code pack containing 100 ready-made CSS3 styles for pagination controls, sold for $15 with a PSD source file included. Pagination is the row of numbered links, arrows or “next” buttons that lets visitors move between pages of results, and this pack supplies those controls as pre-written CSS rather than asking a developer to build them from scratch. It suits front-end developers, theme authors and freelancers who want a large library of pager designs they can drop into an existing project and restyle.
The product comes from an established Envato Market author with more than nine years on the marketplace and a stated base of over 100,000 customers. Sales figures for this particular item are not disclosed, so no purchase volume can be cited as evidence of demand.
What the 100 CSS3 Pagination Styles Pack Actually Contains
The core of the package is a library of 100 distinct pagination designs, all built with CSS3 rather than images or JavaScript. That matters for practical reasons: because the styles are pure CSS, the pager markup stays light, the file size stays small, and the appearance can be changed by editing a stylesheet instead of regenerating graphics.
Each style ships with a defined hover state, so the visual feedback a visitor sees when pointing at a page number is already handled. Hover states are one of the details that separate a polished pager from a flat one, and having 100 of them pre-built removes a repetitive task from the design process.
The pack includes a PSD source file. This is the layered Photoshop document behind the designs, and it gives a designer the option to adjust a layout in an image editor before translating it back into CSS — useful when a client wants a specific look that no existing style quite matches.
The vendor describes the styles as highly customizable and easy to implement. In practice, that means a developer can take one of the 100 designs, copy its CSS rules into a project stylesheet, and then change colours, border radii, spacing and fonts through ordinary CSS properties. No build tools, frameworks or dependencies are mentioned, which keeps the integration path short.
One compatibility caveat is stated plainly by the vendor: Internet Explorer does not support some CSS3 attributes. Anyone who still has to support legacy IE will need to test the chosen style in that browser and accept that rounded corners, gradients or transitions may not render identically.
Where This Pagination Style Library Fits, and Where It Does Not
The clearest fit is a developer working on a blog, news site, e-commerce category page or search results page that already has pagination logic in place but needs a better-looking set of controls. The markup for a pager is usually simple — a container with links or list items — so swapping in a new visual style is a contained job rather than a structural one.
Theme and template authors are another natural audience. A commercial theme benefits from a distinctive pager, and having 100 options on hand means a designer can pick a style that matches a theme’s overall aesthetic without commissioning custom work. The same logic applies to agencies producing multiple client sites in a short period, where reusing a proven pager style saves time across projects.
It is the wrong choice for anyone who needs pagination behaviour rather than pagination appearance. This pack does not generate page links, query a database or handle infinite scroll; that logic has to come from the CMS, framework or custom code already in the project. A developer looking for a JavaScript pagination component with built-in data handling will not find it here.
It is also a poor fit for a project with a strict, single-brand design system where only one pager style will ever be used. Paying for 100 styles when one is needed is a mismatch, and a small custom stylesheet would do the same job.
Setting Up a Pagination Style in Practice
Setup is straightforward and does not require a build step. The workflow is to open the included files, preview the styles, choose one, and copy its CSS into the project’s stylesheet or a separate file. The corresponding HTML structure — typically an unordered list or a set of anchor tags — then needs to match the class names used by the chosen style.
Prerequisites are minimal: a working knowledge of HTML and CSS, and a project that already outputs pagination markup. There is no mention of Sass, JavaScript or any framework requirement, so a plain stylesheet is enough. Because the vendor does not state which CSS3 features each style relies on, developers targeting older browsers should check the specific style they pick rather than assuming uniform support.
Realistically, selecting a style and wiring it into a single template takes well under an hour for someone comfortable with CSS. The longer task is browsing 100 options to find the right one, which is a design decision rather than a technical one. The PSD file adds time only if a designer chooses to modify a layout before converting it back to CSS.
Support is handled through the vendor’s own forum rather than the marketplace messaging system. The team works in GMT+1 and states an aim of replying within 24 hours on weekdays, extending to 48 hours in some cases, with weekend and public holiday requests handled on the next business day.
Strengths and Limitations of the Pack
Strengths
- A large volume of finished pager designs in one purchase, which removes repetitive styling work across multiple projects.
- Pure CSS3 implementation keeps the output lightweight and avoids a JavaScript dependency for what is a visual concern.
- Hover states are included with every style, so interactive feedback does not need to be added separately.
- The PSD source file gives designers a route to modify a layout before writing CSS.
- Customization uses standard CSS properties, so no proprietary tooling is required to adapt a style.
- Backed by an author with a long marketplace history and a stated large customer base.
Limitations
- Internet Explorer support is incomplete for some CSS3 attributes, as the vendor acknowledges. Projects with legacy browser requirements will need per-style testing.
- The pack is a visual library only. It does not provide pagination logic, so it cannot be used as a standalone solution.
- No documentation detail is supplied on which CSS3 features each individual style uses, which makes browser targeting a manual check.
- The item is a first release with no update history, so there is no track record of maintenance or added styles over time.
- Sales figures are not disclosed, so there is no independent signal of how widely the pack has been adopted.
- Support runs through an external forum in a single time zone, which may slow responses for buyers working across other regions.
How This Compares With Other Pagination Options
The main alternative is building pagination styles by hand. A developer can write a single pager stylesheet in an afternoon, and for a project that needs one look, that is often the cheaper and cleaner route. The advantage of a 100-style pack appears when a team needs variety — several client sites, a theme with multiple skins, or a design process that benefits from comparing options side by side rather than starting from a blank file.
A second alternative is a CSS framework’s built-in pagination component. Frameworks typically ship one or two pager styles tied to their own class naming and design language. That is convenient inside a project already using the framework, but it offers little visual range and couples the pager to the framework’s conventions. A standalone pack like this one is framework-agnostic, which makes it easier to drop into a bespoke build.
A third option is a JavaScript pagination library. Those solve a different problem: they generate page links, handle data fetching and manage state. They are the right tool when pagination behaviour is missing, and the wrong tool when only the appearance needs changing. The two categories are complementary rather than competing, and this pack sits firmly on the styling side.
On price, $15 places the item at the low end of the marketplace’s code category, which is consistent with a static asset pack rather than a full application or plugin.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need JavaScript to use these pagination styles?
No. The styles are written in pure CSS3, so they work without any JavaScript. The pack controls how pagination looks, not how it behaves, so the links themselves still need to be generated by the CMS, framework or custom code already running on the site.
Can these pagination styles be customized to match my brand colours?
Yes. Because every style is plain CSS, colours, borders, spacing, fonts and hover effects can all be edited with standard CSS properties. The vendor describes the pack as highly customizable, and the included PSD source file allows layout changes in an image editor before the CSS is adjusted.
Do the pagination styles work in Internet Explorer?
Only partially. The vendor states that Internet Explorer does not support some CSS3 attributes, so effects such as rounded corners, gradients or transitions may not render. Anyone supporting IE should test the specific style chosen, since the listing does not document which CSS3 features each of the 100 styles uses.
What is included in the download besides the CSS files?
The package contains 100 predefined CSS3 pagination styles, each with a hover state, plus a PSD source file for the designs. The vendor does not state whether demo HTML pages or written documentation are bundled, so buyers should check the item page for the full file list before purchasing.
Verdict
This pack is worth buying for front-end developers, theme authors and agencies that regularly build pagination and want a broad library of finished styles to draw from. At $15, the cost is low enough that using even a handful of the 100 designs across projects justifies the purchase, and the PSD file adds value for designers who like to adjust layouts before writing code. It is not the right purchase for someone who needs pagination logic, or for a project that will only ever use one pager style, where a short custom stylesheet is the more sensible route. Buyers with legacy Internet Explorer requirements should treat the CSS3 caveat as a real constraint rather than a footnote. The lack of disclosed sales and the absence of any update history are reasons to set expectations modestly on long-term maintenance.
